Constructive Quantum Field Theory

The pioneering work of early non-relativistic quantum theory led to the understanding that quantum dynamics on Hilbert space is a comprehensive predictive framework for microscopic phenomena. From the Bohr atom, through the nonrelativistic quantum theory of Schrödinger and Heisenberg, and the relativistic Dirac equation for hydrogen, agreement between calculation and experiment improved rapidly over time. The incorporation of special relativity and field theory into quantum theory extended the scope of perturbative calculations, and these were tested through precision measurements of spectra and magnetic moments. Beginning in the 1940’s, experimental tests of the Lamb shift and the anomalous magnetic moment of the electron detected effects that one can ascribe to fluctuations in quantum electrodynamics. These effects deviated numerically from the predictions arising from equations that describe a fixed number of particles, so they were accurate tests of the quantum field hypothesis. Today these experiments have evolved to yield quantitative agreement with the most precise observations and calculations achieved in physics. For example, the anomalous magnetic moment of the electron is known theoretically and experimentally to amazing precision: (g − 2)/2 = 0.001159652200(±40). The success of this work, as well as the success of other less accurate, but compelling, predictions for weak and strong interactions, convince us to accept quantum field theory as the correct physical arena to describe particle physics down to the Planck scale. But the success of relativistic field theory calculations and of perturbative renormalization also led to a logical puzzle: is there any physically-relevant, relativistic quantum field theory that is also mathematically consistent? Put differently, can one give a mathematically complete example of any non-linear theory, relevant for the description of interacting particles, whose solutions incorporate relativistic covariance, positive energy, and causality? One must understand perturbative renormalization in order to resolve this problem, and have control over renormalization from a non-perturbative (or “exact”) point of view. In fact, one needs to overcome sophisticated problems, such as whether a field theory may appear correct on a perturbative level, while it may have no meaning at a non-perturbative level. Doubts about quantum electrodynamics or scalar meson theory were raised early by Dyson and Landau. They recur from the point of view of the renormalization group in the work of Kadanoff and Wilson, as well as in the analysis of “asymptotic